

Academic Programs Management - Assessment, Planning, and Positioning
Institutions of higher education are facing an increasingly competitive, saturated market with declining overall general demand for traditional programs and delivery formats. At the same time, there is significant increasing demand for programs which are highly focused and industry-specific, many of which are based on credentials and certifications, as well as significant growth in demand for and acceptance of online learning. The result of this is heightened competition where competitors no longer need proximity to students or even a physical campus. These changes in the marketplace reflect the fact that families are increasingly questioning the overall value and return of traditional undergraduate degree programs.
In tandem with these shifts, operating costs continue to escalate during a time in which maintaining, let alone growing, revenue has become increasingly challenging, especially for those institutions which remain focused on recruiting traditional students. Unfortunately, those involved with academic program review at most institutions approach the process from a defensive position with an overriding concern of maintaining existing programs at all costs. This creates inefficient allocation of resources and impedes the institution's ability to response strategically to changes taking place in the industry.
Activities:
- Facilitated discussions and/or retreats with Provost / Chief Academic Officer and academic Deans
- Facilitated discussions and/or retreats with President, Provost / Chief Academic Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Enrollment Officer, and other select key stakeholders / decision makers
Goals:
- Analysis of enrollment date of existing programs and market trends with recommendations
- Objective analysis of enrollment and retention data to facilitate strategic review of academic program portfolio
- Alignment of academic programs with mission
- Analysis of institutional positioning and opportunities
Value Provided:
- Objective, independent, external guidance, free from institutional politics, which helps to identify, clarify and assess assumptions and market conditions
- Facilitated discussion of questions which might not otherwise be asked, considering politics typically inherent within the academic enterprise